Видео

Not the best solution

If you want to make this much better remove the first if statement and instead of returning Fizz or Buzz or FizzBuzz instead concatenate the strings together starting with if i%3=0 concatenate Fizz and i%5=0 concatenates Buzz. This allows you to optimize the code significantly saving redundant if statements

Thankyou for this.. Appreciated ❤

Hi, I visited your profile and noticed that you are putting a lot of effort into your work. However, the editing of your videos could use some improvement. My name is Hammad Aslam, and I have over 4 years of experience as a professional video editor. I have a 5-star rating on Upwork. If you enhance the editing of your videos, it can significantly increase your views. I have edited numerous videos for my clients, who have been very impressed with my work. This has led to long-term collaborations. We can start by having a Google meeting or a chat to discuss how we can grow your channel from today onwards. I look forward to your reply. Best regards, Hammad Aslam

Hi , I visited your profile and noticed that you are putting a lot of effort into your work. However, the editing of your videos could use some improvement. My name is Hammad Aslam, and I have over 4 years of experience as a professional video editor. I have a 5-star rating on Upwork. If you enhance the editing of your videos, it can significantly increase your views. I have edited numerous real estate videos for my clients, who have been very impressed with my work. This has led to long-term collaborations. We can start by having a Google meeting or a chat to discuss how we can grow your channel from today onwards. I look forward to your reply. Best regards, Hammad Aslam

Thank you thank you everyone who joined and was active in the chat - special shout out to - James (CTRI alum), Eleanor (PTRI alum)!

I'm not sure if its just me or something but i felt like i learned very little from this video. i just watched 1hr and 20 minutes of the class doing logic, I found very little explanation in any of the statements from the teacher, it's not a terrible video but I do believe it could be remade, also on a side note the only reason I understood most of this video is because I have spent a good bit of time learning other language's such as C++ and C# so I already have some knowledge here. So for a brand new learner this video would only confuse them if not maybe even stop their whole journey as a learner

25:55 content start

We need more courses from sir will sentance like hard parts of javascript interview 😅 on Frontend masters

Great song! :) a track to the max!

Still a 👍🏽in 2024

Keyboard name ?

If you need the links let us know, and will send it!

Fluent Icons by Miguel Solorio

Symbols by Miguel Solorio

Just sort and get the last element

THAT really is life as a software engineer

Randy?!

Give any js dev a syntax for making life easier will always misuse it

The example is showing the concept correctly, but the definition is not. A closure occurs when a function is CREATED in another function. The inner function can be stored somewhere and not necessarily returned. Similarly, functions being first class objects can be returned from a function, as a reference from somewhere else, in which case no closure is involved. So the statement "closure always occurs when a function returns a function" is not correct.

cout<<*max_element(arr.begin(), arr.end())<<endl;

bad audio quality

Or you could just code in C and actually learn why you are doing things…

Thid problem exclusive to JS.

Thanks to the instructor!

Just completed this assignment and am getting "X - expected '22' to equal 4" in the problem checking interface. I was puzzled by this because my output is the exact expected output and doesn't say 22 anywhere. I came her to check and....I have the exact same code as the solution given here. Anyone else getting this? Seems like a bug.

Love seeing how the increment operator doesn't update the index variable until after the 'result' has been updated. Really cool insight into how JS handles tasks. Thank you!

And then cry that JS is slow. If you work with that huge data sets, write your own "low level" plain-old-for-loop algorithm for such trivial things instead of wasting cpu time for "fancy functional code".

Is creating a problem out of nothing is a blessing, curse or skill?

🫶🏼

Why would anyone ever try to work with big data in JavaScript? It's used to implement logic and certain functionality for front-end, not back-end.

0:01

No, The best way is use $max that in mongoDB⭐😀 reduce with large array takes much of memory

These people should not be come close to computers …

Why oh why are simple for-loops so hated?

L language

Thank you! Keep it going RUclips recommends!!

Why can't the JS max function just take an array as parameter...

In all honesty, when it comes to learning and sharing expertise, there isn’t need to tag, cite someone else’s content to show it wasn’t comprehensive and then show that you cracked the code of the thing, and let me show how its done. Just a personal opinion. But thank you, something new to me and JavaScript full of these swags anyways.

There is problem with your code too, if we passed empty array, it will throw type error, always use initial variable with reduce, in this case -inf

How are you defining the accumulator and the current element? Just a and b? That feels extremely confusing...

'Promosm'

I use Microsoft Paint as my IDE

You are going to make me cry with the end 😭😭😭

Do u have the source code?

Wow this is so nice! I want to learn CSS